Short answer
The useful comparison is not “which host is fastest?” It is which complete setup covers the work you cannot sustainably own, at a cost that still makes sense across ten separate client sites.
When this decision matters
You are adding clients, renewing a multi-site plan, or spending too much time on routine maintenance.
Questions the setup must answer
- Are updates, staging, malware response and restores included or still your responsibility?
- Are site limits, storage, traffic and email compared at the same workload?
- Can each client eventually own their account, domain and billing?
- What happens to first-year pricing at renewal?
How AppReadyLab will test it
01
Define the ten-site fixture
02
Compare complete 12-month cost
03
Run recovery and handover tasks
Seven dimensions remain visible
A candidate can be inexpensive and still create a poor decision if recovery, ownership, access, or daily work is hidden. The final comparison keeps all seven dimensions available even when the user prioritises only two.